NEW YORK (Frameshop) – As OWS heads into its first winter, the time has come to have a serious discussion about whether or not the movement should shift its focus and take up as its top priority the goal of influencing the outcome of the 2012 Presidential election? Should OWS become “occupy the Democratic Party” as a strategy of influencing the outcome of 2012 elections–yes or no? My answer is: No, it should not. Why not? Let me answer that question with another question: Is it possible to transform a gambling casino into a public park or a school or a hospital, simply by walking into it and playing blackjack? Of course not. If a park, school or hospital is what you want, you need to go out and build it.
Follow on Twitter:
- David Vitter is trash--nasty trash with cat litter & those squishy things they put under raw chicken... goo.gl/CEByx 12 hours ago
- For their decision, Scout Board earns the badge of cruelty to minors, the cowardice/dishonor badge, & the WTF badge. 21 hours ago
- Malkin & Hannity try to talk about Woolrich, both drown in a soup bowl of stupid... bit.ly/14VAD3G 1 day ago
- This is an utterly astounding article... bit.ly/10nj7Cc #Woolrich 2 days ago
- "Dems had every advantage on the immigration issue--& still caved on their goals, preemptively" bit.ly/12Wchpb #goteam 2 days ago
- NYC mayor's race just got interesting... n.pr/13KPZZG 2 days ago
- Congrats Mayor Garcetti! Maybe, now, Jews will finally be accepted in Los Angeles... goo.gl/cv6EM #callyourmother 2 days ago
- Potato salad has more brains than James Inhofe. bit.ly/10iHZed 3 days ago
- Tom Coburn trying real, real hard to be a bigger asshat than the Westboro Baptist Church clowns... bit.ly/191frMN 3 days ago
- Chris Matthews is the new MoDo. 1 week ago



